Collaboratory google dependencies12/8/2023 As a result, virtual teams spend substantial time and money to relocate team members for specific projects to avoid the hindrances to teamwork associated with distance. As a result, virtual teams are experiencing difficulties collaborating that are making it difficult for them to be as successful as co-located teams. Similar to co-located teams, virtual teams participate in a variety of collaborative activities such as formal and informal meetings using technology like video conferencing (e.g., Zoom and Skype ) and text (e.g., Slack and Microsoft Teams ), file transfer, and application sharing. This implies that, as a result, virtual teams have become vital to maintaining our increasingly globalized social and economic infrastructure. It was estimated that by 2016, more than 85 % of working professionals were in some form of virtual team. In theory, virtual teams also reduce the need for travelling between sites, which should reduce costs in terms of time, money, and stress. This allows organizations to optimize teams by using only the best talent available. The use of virtual teams allows organizations to enroll key specialists, regardless of their physical location. Much like collaboration in co-located teams, collaboration in virtual teams refers to synchronous and asynchronous interactions and tasks to achieve common goals. Virtual teams (i.e., geographically distributed collaborations that rely on technology to communicate and cooperate) have several potentially beneficial aspects that aid productivity. Finally, we use these results to discuss opportunities and implications for designing groupware that better support collaborative tasks in virtual teams. In addition, findings from this literature review expose opportunities for research, such as resolving discrepancies regarding the effect of tightly coupled work on collaboration and the effect of temporal dispersion on coordination costs. However, based on research topics in the selected studies, we separate challenges as belonging to five categories: geographical distance, temporal distance, perceived distance, the configuration of dispersed teams, and diversity of workers. The physical factors relating to distance are tightly coupled with the cognitive, social, and emotional challenges faced by virtual teams. In this review, a well-planned search strategy was utilized to identify a total of 255 relevant studies, primarily focusing on technology use. To address this issue, a literature review was performed to highlight the collaboration challenges experienced by virtual teams and existing mitigation strategies. However, there has been little work in examining the challenges faced by virtual teams and their use of technology to mitigate issues. There has been a multitude of studies examining the difficulties faced by collaborations and use of technology in various narrow contexts. “Global Virtual Teams” that include members from around the world are the most extreme example and are growing in prevalence (Scott and Wildman in Culture, communication, and conflict: a review of the global virtual team literature, Springer, New York, 2015). Virtual teams (i.e., geographically distributed collaborations that rely on technology to communicate and cooperate) are central to maintaining our increasingly globalized social and economic infrastructure.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |